What Key Points Should Be Highlighted in a Discussion?

The discussion section is a vital part of the research paper which seeks to respond in detail to the questions laid out in the study. Here, you make conclusions, show the key points that you contributed to the creation of the work, and explain to the readers why your work is significant. Often, this is one of the sections that are hard to complete as an author needs to explain the real importance of outcomes and reconcile everything related to the research questions. 

In today’s blog post, we discuss the steps to writing the discussion section of the research paper. We will look at many discussion essential elements and examples and learn more about how to write a good discussion section for your research paper. 

Discussion example 

It is thus important that the discussion section is one of the most critical sections of your research paper. This is where you conclude by presenting the results in a manner that would enlighten your readers on why they should care about your work (Refnwrite). This is one of the sections that are quite difficult to write because the author has to justify the relevance of the results and relate everything to the research questions. For many students who opt for dissertation writing service online, their pro writers take care of this section without any hassle.

What should be some of the guidelines I have to follow while writing my discussion section? 

In general, the effective discussion section of a research paper is usually composed of the following elements.  

• Research summary 
• Interpretation of findings 
• Comparison with literature 
• Implications of your work 
• Limitations 
• Future work 

However, you can always hire dissertation discussion writing help uk online and let them take over your project.

Discussion Examples 

Now let’s consider several examples of the discussion section. In the remaining text, we will be presenting examples of the discussions from various fields and various formats. To make it very simple for you to follow and understand we have divided this section into sub-sections. 

The following are some examples of how research summaries need to be done in discussion

The discussion section of any work ought to ideally begin with the summarization of the completed paper. It will therefore be effective to reiterate your research question, and then point your readers to your methods of analysis, and then, in conclusion, offer a brief overview of your findings. 

The objectives of this study were therefore to conduct a comparative analysis of various storm detection software in storm tracking to assess their efficiency and ease of use. Based on these aimed objectives, we undertook multiple experiments with the same conditions but with different storm detection software. From the analysis, it was evident that in terms of both speed and accuracy of data ‘software A’ outperformed ‘software B’. 

This example of the discussion is from the field of engineering research papers. For that reason, the authors are repeating their aim first, which is to compare various forms of storm-tracking software. Then they give a quick description of the methods, where they again, it seems they are linking it with correlations. Here, different storm-tracking software are run under different test scenarios to determine its effectiveness. They then attest to their primary finding which is that ‘software A is better than software B’. This is a very good example of how one can lead into the discussion section to give brief background information on the study. 

A good example of how result interpretation was done in the discussion 

The next dimension is to analyze your results. One of the requirements is that you should be able to extend clear explanations to your readers concerning your findings. Here is a discussion example that will illustrate how to address your results. 

Based on the findings of this research there is clear evidence that there is a difference between classical and pop music in so far as their impact on memory and thinking skills is concerned. This means that with an increase in the level of music difficulty, there is a corresponding increase in the efficiency of the music in handling cognitive processing. This result supports the so-called ‘Mozart effect’ which states that subjects’ abilities to perform certain tasks can be improved by listening to classical pieces. 

What the authors mean is that their findings prove that while listening to popular music, people perform worse when it comes to memory and thinking in comparison to the effect that classical music has on their memory and thinking. Now they are coming out with their version of the findings. This they believe is due to the correlation that exists between the degree of music and cognitive functioning. They are also referring to another theory that has also been widely known as the ‘Mozart effect’ in support of their discovery. The passage is well written and indeed the author has done a good job in trying to explain the meaning of the piece in a very believable manner. 

Discussion of literature can be exemplified by a compare and contrast technique. 

The final process is always to validate the findings you get with the data found in other studies. It matters to point out how your findings differ or are similar to other researchers’ findings in a very exhaustive manner. Below is an example where authors are giving the details of papers in the literature that are in favor and against their argument. 

Therefore, based on the analysis in this paper, climate change effects are expected to have a devastating effect on the yield of wheat. By discounting the importance of temperature fluctuations, this finding challenges a source of evidence used in some of the prior simulation studies [1-3] concluding that climate change harms wheat yield but is in complete agreement with other theoretical work [4-5] that climate change may improve total yield. 

The authors proclaim that their realized facts illustrate that climate change will adversely affect the production of wheat. They then argue that there are studies in the literature in support of what they have found. But they are not without opposition as numerous papers in the literature refute their conclusions. This is very important. As much as it can be, your discussion should be fair, not biased. You should not reject the literature which is not supporting your conclusion. 

At last

To ensure that your readers walk away with this impression you should not be shy to sound childish and parrot-like when presenting your ideas (BAW, 2022), results, or anything that is new and you consider nobody else has discovered except you in the discussion. For more dramatic and convincing results choose such words as ‘penetration’, ‘unquestionable proof’, and ‘fascinating offer’.

References

Refnwrite. (2023, September 15). Discussion section Examples and writing tips. Ref-n-Write: Scientific Research Paper Writing Software. https://www.ref-n-write.com/blog/discussion-section-examples-and-writing-tips/

BAW (2022). How Academic Help Providers Save the Students’ Future? https://bestassignmentwriter.co.uk/blog/how-academic-help-providers-save-the-students-future/